The True Nature of Digital Art or Science Photography

The True Nature of Digital Art or Science Photography: What is the true nature of digital photography? Lots of people have been asking this question for a long time. In fact, when people ask about the true nature of digital photography, they often ask whether it's art or science.

The True Nature of Digital Art or Science Photography

Before answering the question of the True Nature of Digital Art or Science Photography. Following are some arguments from Art and Science

1. Art

Many people consider digital photography to be an art because it allows emotional expression. They on average believe that digital photography is an update of the art of drawing or painting. they argue that digital photography is almost the same as painting even though taking accurate reality pictures, it also allows for some modifications through various digital tools available today.

Even without editing, many people still believe that digital photography is art because of the fact that it really takes an artist's eye to find a great subject from digital photography. The nature of digital photography as art has to do with the fact that an artist is able to express emotions and statements through visuals.

Proponents of the "artistic nature of digital photography" also denied their case by expressing their ability to convey emotional messages through aesthetics. The beauty of each photo, of course, must also be credited to the person who took the picture. One of the strongest arguments for the artistic nature of digital photography is the fact that images are rarely really seen with the naked eye. Through a camera and computer, someone can change the image to present what he wants to show.

2. Science

As with art, some people argue that science is the true nature of digital photography. One argument is that photography, unlike painting, actually comes from something that exists and not from the painter's thoughts or emotions. This can be very persuasive because, indeed, a photographer doesn't really make a photo. He just took it.

Another argument about the scientific nature of digital photography is the fact that editing is done by people and the adjustments made by photographers are based on a series of steps that can be scientifically narrowed. People who argue about the scientific nature of digital photography may reason that a similar set of steps can be taken to achieve the same results. There is a certain quality of determination about digital photography that makes it science.

But what is the True Nature of Digital Art or Science Photography? after you read the statement above. There seems to be no solution to this question, right?

The true nature of digital photography will always remain a paradox. This means that even though it can be considered as art, it can also be considered a science. When was the paradox of the nature of digital photography solved? Well, that's solved when someone takes a digital photo.

The true nature of digital photography lies in the hands of people who take pictures. The way someone treats the process of defining the nature of digital photography for him. This is not just art, nor is it science. The true nature of digital photography is still a paradox. This may seem contradictory, but somehow you please describe it yourself.

Advertisement